New type of chess move rank?

So, recently @Gothamchess made a new video on youtube about a move in chess that is very crazy. We all know inaccuracy, Mistake, Blunder, Great move, best move and obviously our all time favorite, a brilliant move. But According to him there should be a higher ranking for great chess moves in chess.com. 

https://youtu.be/YhjmNCXULbE?si=INzqotml7CZ62Coh

And so thus I got up for it's rank. And I believe that this logo and name will be perfect for the move.

And the name is: Godly move!!!

So, I request all the staffs and mods to add the godly move feature in chess.com. I would really love to see the purplish-bluish icon (logo) to appear when a move like that is played in the game review or the analysis. This move will have a higher value than brilliant and it should be very rare. 

Tell me in the comments what you think about this.

Very nice idea. This move should be a grandmaster level move

Yeah butbI think it should be even rarer as the bishop sacrifice was very hard to find.

maybe it should be genius or unbelieveable in my opinion

Yes but will be unfindable.

Yes that what I want it to be as well.

How do you programmatically define hard to find?

What do you mean?

I had a typo but using code, it hard to come up with a definition of a move that is hard to find. Even some humans can disagree on that.

Well may your right but I gotta think about this.

maybe use the same definition as the old brilliant move (a move that the engine initially misevaluates). and use the old version of the engine to make it more consistent.

that is a great idea

maybe there could be a discussion at the next chess.com meeting?

also what about dubious move from lichess?

Great Idea guys, so it can be like piece sacrifice that even the engine will trifle a second or so and then finally find it, and it is a move that can combine strategy and tactical motive or attacking and defending.

The old definition didn't really find many moves that were really brilliant; that's one reason the definition was modified. It's very hard to define hard to find and what's hard to find for some people, isn't for others, and what's hard to find for an engine generally requires letting it sit on a position to a very high depth, over a couple of moves, which isn't something that will be done in a review.

Hmm yeah but how about it being a brilliant move where you sacrifice a peice or more for positional proposes or when it has both attacking and defending ideas.

Same reason why there is no "interresting move" (!?), it's vague an idea, nearly artistic, hence includes an idea of beauty. Beauty and ugliness are ideas that are impossible to code, impossible to explain to a machine. A machine, a computer, no mater how "brilliant" and "smart", will just never, ever, be able to understand such concepts, when, let's be honest, it doesn't even know what "blue" or "red" means.

We, human beings, are unable to describe a colour to a person who is blind from birth. And yet, we are "coded" with the idea of beauty, which can't be put into mathematical equations, into numbers. Computers work with "1 or 0", as in: "there is or there is not". And that do exclude a whole set of ideas and notions, we, human beings, are familiar with.