Puzzle ratings

Your puzzle rating a year ago more accurately represented your actual rating. I'm guessing since then you started using an engine for puzzle completion.

If your puzzle solving methods were completely valid, your calculation and pattern recognition skills would be over the roof. Clearly they aren't seen in your games, which leads me to

Conclusion #1: You are a sandbagger and you are purposefully playing bad. This is very unlikely, as someone with such a strong puzzle rating like you would 100% have a title.

Conclusion #2: You are allowing someone else much worse to play on your account which is affecting your live rating. Again, this is very unlikely as your account would be banned.

Conclusion #3: You are using an engine for puzzle completion. You want attention for being such a great puzzle solver even though your actual rating and puzzle comprehension is quite low. This is the most likely scenario.

On puzzle rush (which I assume you aren't cheating on) you don't go higher than a rating of 1800. If you are actually 4900+ rated in puzzles, puzzle rush should be lightwork and that clearly isn't seen. You are 100% botting puzzles, stop lying.

XD

If I was using an engine why wouldn’t i get a high chess rating

Because using an engine in live games isn't allowed. What r u on bro

puzzles SUCK

I mean it is true

Also Theo, no one asked about ur 3500+ rating… i mean mine might be bad(1000 ) but, no need to brag… I’m just saying…. plz forgive me for saying mean stuff to u

You can find more here:

https://support.chess.com/en/articles/8583921-what-counts-as-cheating-on-chess-com

I'm just providing information. I'm not accusing you of cheating, that's not allowed on the forum.

I did check one of your recent Blitz games. Congrats on gaining 1900 puzzle rating in a week and a half. That's impressive, by any standard. Especially since you were already at a 3000 rating. Even more impressive for a player that currently doesn't win too many games at a 600 rating level,

Wait so how in the world are there 100 elo players with 60000+ puzzle rating? They should be banned by this point, according to that rule.

That rule might be outdated maybe???

…