Forums

What do you like in Live Chess Quick, Bitz or Long?

Sort:
liangkaiwen

long is good with a decent opponent but a minute per move can be frustrating. quick is basically who can make the fastest moves that still require some thought by the other person. so all in all, i think neither is gr8 and i still stand by blitz as my favorite

musiquismo

i only play 1 minute games, its a rush and a prettu complex games, its not just about getting a winning position but also about not getting out of time

Gwkiller69
Kupov wrote:

Quick games are the worst way to improve your chess in my opinion.


I totally agree with that...I prefer 10 0 blitz, when I play long the opponent takes too long or cheats, but if I play quick, like 1 minute, then people do the opening and prety much move randomely at the end, its just whoever can move faster >.<

Gwkiller69
musiquismo wrote:

i only play 1 minute games, its a rush and a prettu complex games, its not just about getting a winning position but also about not getting out of time


Exactly, that's why it's horrible, chess is about thinking, not fast random moves...

musiquismo

you still have think, just think really fast. If you play random moves you get checkmated, im not saying is the best way to imporve, its certainly dosent involve any postional themes, its really tactical, your always playnig for the throat, but its fun, you cant cheat, and its a race to checkmating your oponent.

jrcolonial98

definately not quick because the clocks are messed up, so I say blitz.

theusualsuspect

1 minute games are the worst. Eventually it just comes down to moving as quick as you canĀ and trying not to lose on time, instead of actually playing the best moves available. 5-10 minutes is probably the best, depending on how much time you have.