which is better, magnus or hikaru?
Sort:
Hikaru is a grand streamer but it is not comparable to the level of magnus or kasparov, in my opinion magnus
I'd choose magnus too, hikaru does beat magnus sometimes but i'd say magnus is better overall
Lifetime score in classical: The Magster 14 wins. Nakamura 1 win. 26 draws. So 66% to 34% in favor of Sauron (how Naka referred to Magnus a few years back).
In blitz/rapid: Magnus 98 wins. Naka 49 wins. 127 draws. That's 59% Magnus to 41% for Naka.
I'm even thinking their bullet score overall is in Carlsens favor but Naka won the tournaments. There's probaby a record of all their chess.com results.
Inspire_YT wrote:
I think hikaru could easily beat kasparov but not carlsen
isnt kasparov considered the greatest chess player of all time?
yeah but magnus beat kasparov when he was young i think
both are goated
chessplayerthatloveschess wrote:
yeah but magnus beat kasparov when he was young i think
what does that have to do with Hikaru and Kasparov tho
idk lol
just cause why not
alright guys new question which is better fischer or kasparov
I would choose Fischer
warlard69420 wrote:
Magnus Carlsen, the greatest player of all time.
the question is which is better fischer or kasparov
I think it really depends on the day with those two. They go back and forth and are pretty much intellectually equally matched. Magnus may have won more matches, but they draw just as much if not more.
I would choose fischer, he was a god until what happened to him
Southern_Pride wrote:
Paul Morphy beats both of them, even if they had the assistance of alpha zero and stockfish.
cap bro
Which stockfish are you talking about
if it was stockfish -99 and alphazero knew nothing about chess then maybe
chessplayerthatloveschess wrote:
if it was stockfish -99 and alphazero knew nothing about chess then maybe
true
Which of the 2 legends are better? I would choose magnus