What is your rapid win rate all time
Sort:
Mine is 69% win 26% loss 5% draw
74% win, 21% loss, 5% draw.
Same draw percent? Interesting. Congrats for 74%! Let's see who's win rate is bigger.
Your elo is higher! Your higher win rate is because of that?
TrickyKnight373737 wrote:
Your elo is higher! Your higher win rate is because of that?
No I have a 50/50 all time win rate lol
Probably more like 49/49
Though you win more games you do typically get higher elo
51% win, 7% draw, 42% loss
my draw rate used to be 15 lol
At first I thought this was an uninteresting topic, but now I am very interested. How can anybody who has played a lot of games have a win rate at 70% or even higher like some people here? If you are winning 70% of your games, and Chess.com matches you with better and better players as your rating increases, then you must be a GM by now. If you win a bunch of games, your rating goes up, you should get matched up against better players, and you should start losing more often. (My rapid win rate is pretty close to 49%.)
8, they played low rated players, or lost more like I have in daily and then get good
probably the former
Any others' win rate?
Dominating with a 50% win rate, I face defeat in just 20% of matches, while 30% end in draws.
Liar! You haven't played any games!
TrickyKnight373737 wrote:
Mine is 69% win 26% loss 5% draw
I checked your insights and your average rapid opponent was rated 766.
Your average opponent you won against was rated 676, while average opponent you lost to was rated 990. And you are 1200 rapid.
Something's definitely fishy. Have you been playing some friends or family members that have extremely low rating and beating them repeatedly? That's the only explanation I can come up with
#14 yes I am playing with my friend unrated games, who is 200-300 rated, and in that games I am teaching him and trying to make new variants for example we can't take any pieces. And, when he win against me, it is unrated but because of something it counts. And when i win, too. And I have a 500 rated friend too, and we are playing a lot. This is the reason.
With my 200-300 rated friend (who is not in my friends list because of something), i played 266 games, and 213 win 36 loss and 17 draw. With my 500 rated friend (who is 700 rated, I checked it now), I played 86 games, and 74 win, 10 loss, and 2 draw. So, i think now you know the reason.
I though so lol. Because if you play classic games against equal opponents, rating is always around 50/50 unless you are a new player who is still under rated, which you are not
davidk67 wrote:
At first I thought this was an uninteresting topic, but now I am very interested. How can anybody who has played a lot of games have a win rate at 70% or even higher like some people here? If you are winning 70% of your games, and Chess.com matches you with better and better players as your rating increases, then you must be a GM by now. If you win a bunch of games, your rating goes up, you should get matched up against better players, and you should start losing more often. (My rapid win rate is pretty close to 49%.)
he probably hasn't played many games. OR he plays against lots of low rated players (via direct challenges or in tournaments)
mine is 49% win 5% draw and 46% loss over 6000 games but becuase my rating has gone up so quickly my average opponent rating is 1095 
joshforthewin wrote:
davidk67 wrote:
At first I thought this was an uninteresting topic, but now I am very interested. How can anybody who has played a lot of games have a win rate at 70% or even higher like some people here? If you are winning 70% of your games, and Chess.com matches you with better and better players as your rating increases, then you must be a GM by now. If you win a bunch of games, your rating goes up, you should get matched up against better players, and you should start losing more often. (My rapid win rate is pretty close to 49%.)
he probably hasn't played many games. OR he plays against lots of low rated players (via direct challenges or in tournaments)
I just checked out his stats and yes, I was right he has only played 120 games