for me, it would be 100 because i wouldn't even be able to get an elo of one in bullet.
What is a good (bullet) Elo?
Sort:
Oof.
I'd say U1200 would be a beginner range. Between 1200-1300 is the low end of mid-level, 1300-1600 is a direct middle, and 1600-2000 is the high end of the range. 2000-2300 is a lower high, 2300-2700 is a middle high, and everything above 2700 is extremely advanced.
Let's not talk about how bad my bullet is for my elo...
That's not bad, if anything look at my Rapid and bullet compared to my blitz lol.
Compared to the other 2100s it is bad they are all 2100+ I'm a measly 1900(it's still good technically speaking)
Jared wrote:
Like 1200? 1500? 2000?
What are all the categories (beginner, intermediate, advanced, ect.)?
Remember, this is bullet.
I’m near 1200 so that would be good. (Daniel Naroditsky be like)
Compared to the other 2100s it is bad they are all 2100+ I'm a measly 1900(it's still good technically speaking)
True, we can be bad together lol
593 is the chess.com average bullet rating.
Chris_E_S3 wrote:
593 is the chess.com average bullet rating.
It's because of the amount of accounts that havent played at all.
I think 800 is more accurate.
I divide beginners into these categories: Under 500 are usually horrible players who make moves as fast as possible and can be checkmated in about 10 moves usually. 500-700 is usually players who think about their moves too much and timeout. 700-1000 are decent players who can move fast and think enough for it to be called playing chess. After that, 1000-1500 is intermediate, 1500-2200 is quite good, and Anything above 2200 is just amazing.
2600.
Nah, I'm joking, I think 593 should be fine.
jackityjackjack wrote:
I divide beginners into these categories: Under 500 are usually horrible players who make moves as fast as possible and can be checkmated in about 10 moves usually. 500-700 is usually players who think about their moves too much and timeout. 700-1000 are decent players who can move fast and think enough for it to be called playing chess. After that, 1000-1500 is intermediate, 1500-2200 is quite good, and Anything above 2200 is just amazing.
I'm finally quite good at something 💀
Jared wrote:
Chris_E_S3 wrote:
593 is the chess.com average bullet rating.
It's because of the amount of accounts that havent played at all.
I think 800 is more accurate.
yea 800 is probably accurate
You could beat probably about 80%-90% of players on chess.com, I think that's pretty good.
1200 +
I’d say that where I’m at 1100 is good, but not great. Great is definitely over 2000
2200
Like 1200? 1500? 2000?
What are all the categories (beginner, intermediate, advanced, ect.)?
Remember, this is bullet.