Sos Cardinal hampir
What do you think GM Hikaru IQ is?
Sort:
Vampir.... Cardinal
How i make a choice corectly... If im in hipnotis matrix
The Matrix !
24 days ago
0
#1066
MayTheChikenBeWithYou wrote:
M1m1c15 wrote:
Weird, Einstein only had IQ of 180, so unless your smarter than Einstein (which I assure your not) than your lying
he had an IQ of 160
Einstein is another person whose IQ is “known” by many, despite him never taking a test. So much that is known just isn’t so.
We also have the right to associate IQ with other terms. Personally, I don't like how Quotient sounds so much... maybe it sounds better Immanently Questionable ? Let make a bit popular the Inmanence of Questionability.
24 days ago
0
#1068
Loving the low rated chess players justifying why their still intelligent in this thread lol
... If I had obtained the highest rank, my philosophy and conviction would be same to mine now.I love talking to people regardless of their rank... and regardless many things...online and offline
mpaetz wrote:
Nepotamy wrote:
DiogenesDue wrote:
Nepotamy wrote:
He didn't need to use any sources to estimate. I believe him.
Who's got the low IQ now? Stop believing things without any evidence. There have been exactly zero GMs with proven 180 IQ or over. Didn't you already get schooled about this about 40-50 pages back?
Can a low IQ person get into Mensa and score high on online IQ tests? I think I know what I'm talking about.
But if your theories concerning elo ratings and IQ are correct shouldn't you have a much higher rating here on chess.com?
I don't care enough for chess.
magipi wrote:
mpaetz wrote:
Nepotamy wrote:
Imagine thinking Hikaru isn't smart nor intelligent. So delusional.
No one says that. Most posts here say he likely has above average intelligence, but we have no basis for believing he is one of the most intelligent people on Earth.
Even if someone believes that, it's fine. But Nepotamy claims that he knows. There is no way that can be called other than a bare faced lie.
And then when he was caught with the lie (people pointing out that Steinitz died before IQ tests were invented), he responded by repeating the lies again and again.
Enough with the "he died before IQ tests". You can still estimate their IQs.
mpaetz wrote:
Nepotamy wrote:
Wilhelm Steinitz (1886–1894): 160–170
Emanuel Lasker (1894–1921): 170–180
José Raúl Capablanca (1921–1927): 170–180
Alexander Alekhine (1927–1935, 1937–1946): 175–185
Max Euwe (1935–1937): 165–175
Mikhail Botvinnik (1948–1963, intermittently): 180–190
Vasily Smyslov (1957–1958): 170–180
Mikhail Tal (1960–1961): 175–185
Tigran Petrosian (1963–1969): 165–175
Boris Spassky (1969–1972): 170–180
Bobby Fischer (1972–1975): 180–190
Anatoly Karpov (1975–1985): 170–180
Garry Kasparov (1985–2000): 180–190
Vladimir Kramnik (2000–2007): 170–180
Viswanathan Anand (2007–2013): 165–175
Magnus Carlsen (2013–2023): 190–200
Ding Liren (2023-Present): 170-180
Emanuel Lasker (1894–1921): 170–180
José Raúl Capablanca (1921–1927): 170–180
Alexander Alekhine (1927–1935, 1937–1946): 175–185
Max Euwe (1935–1937): 165–175
Mikhail Botvinnik (1948–1963, intermittently): 180–190
Vasily Smyslov (1957–1958): 170–180
Mikhail Tal (1960–1961): 175–185
Tigran Petrosian (1963–1969): 165–175
Boris Spassky (1969–1972): 170–180
Bobby Fischer (1972–1975): 180–190
Anatoly Karpov (1975–1985): 170–180
Garry Kasparov (1985–2000): 180–190
Vladimir Kramnik (2000–2007): 170–180
Viswanathan Anand (2007–2013): 165–175
Magnus Carlsen (2013–2023): 190–200
Ding Liren (2023-Present): 170-180
The only person on this list known to have taken a professionally administered IQ test with publicly announced results was Kasparov, and his real IQ is at least 50 points lower than the figure you have pulled out of thin air.
Alright. What test did he take? WAIS? SBV? Neither of those were 3 days long. I don't think the test he took was any good.
24 days ago
0
#1073
Nepotamy wrote:
mpaetz wrote:
Nepotamy wrote:
Wilhelm Steinitz (1886–1894): 160–170
Emanuel Lasker (1894–1921): 170–180
José Raúl Capablanca (1921–1927): 170–180
Alexander Alekhine (1927–1935, 1937–1946): 175–185
Max Euwe (1935–1937): 165–175
Mikhail Botvinnik (1948–1963, intermittently): 180–190
Vasily Smyslov (1957–1958): 170–180
Mikhail Tal (1960–1961): 175–185
Tigran Petrosian (1963–1969): 165–175
Boris Spassky (1969–1972): 170–180
Bobby Fischer (1972–1975): 180–190
Anatoly Karpov (1975–1985): 170–180
Garry Kasparov (1985–2000): 180–190
Vladimir Kramnik (2000–2007): 170–180
Viswanathan Anand (2007–2013): 165–175
Magnus Carlsen (2013–2023): 190–200
Ding Liren (2023-Present): 170-180
Emanuel Lasker (1894–1921): 170–180
José Raúl Capablanca (1921–1927): 170–180
Alexander Alekhine (1927–1935, 1937–1946): 175–185
Max Euwe (1935–1937): 165–175
Mikhail Botvinnik (1948–1963, intermittently): 180–190
Vasily Smyslov (1957–1958): 170–180
Mikhail Tal (1960–1961): 175–185
Tigran Petrosian (1963–1969): 165–175
Boris Spassky (1969–1972): 170–180
Bobby Fischer (1972–1975): 180–190
Anatoly Karpov (1975–1985): 170–180
Garry Kasparov (1985–2000): 180–190
Vladimir Kramnik (2000–2007): 170–180
Viswanathan Anand (2007–2013): 165–175
Magnus Carlsen (2013–2023): 190–200
Ding Liren (2023-Present): 170-180
The only person on this list known to have taken a professionally administered IQ test with publicly announced results was Kasparov, and his real IQ is at least 50 points lower than the figure you have pulled out of thin air.
Alright. What test did he take? WAIS? SBV? Neither of those were 3 days long. I don't think the test he took was any good.
Ziryab answered that question for you a couple of days ago; that fact that you can't remember that says a lot about your cognitive abilities. I'd estimate that your IQ is about 90.
Results of an actual test are a lot more believable than "estimates" from people who have never met the person in question.
Nepotamy: Good evening.In case you do accept to respond a question to myself... What percentage of value do you consider approximate as a margin of error on inteligence tests.?I appreciated you can use a percen 1 to 100 or scale 1 to 10 ?
mpaetz wrote:
Nepotamy wrote:
mpaetz wrote:
Nepotamy wrote:
Wilhelm Steinitz (1886–1894): 160–170
Emanuel Lasker (1894–1921): 170–180
José Raúl Capablanca (1921–1927): 170–180
Alexander Alekhine (1927–1935, 1937–1946): 175–185
Max Euwe (1935–1937): 165–175
Mikhail Botvinnik (1948–1963, intermittently): 180–190
Vasily Smyslov (1957–1958): 170–180
Mikhail Tal (1960–1961): 175–185
Tigran Petrosian (1963–1969): 165–175
Boris Spassky (1969–1972): 170–180
Bobby Fischer (1972–1975): 180–190
Anatoly Karpov (1975–1985): 170–180
Garry Kasparov (1985–2000): 180–190
Vladimir Kramnik (2000–2007): 170–180
Viswanathan Anand (2007–2013): 165–175
Magnus Carlsen (2013–2023): 190–200
Ding Liren (2023-Present): 170-180
Emanuel Lasker (1894–1921): 170–180
José Raúl Capablanca (1921–1927): 170–180
Alexander Alekhine (1927–1935, 1937–1946): 175–185
Max Euwe (1935–1937): 165–175
Mikhail Botvinnik (1948–1963, intermittently): 180–190
Vasily Smyslov (1957–1958): 170–180
Mikhail Tal (1960–1961): 175–185
Tigran Petrosian (1963–1969): 165–175
Boris Spassky (1969–1972): 170–180
Bobby Fischer (1972–1975): 180–190
Anatoly Karpov (1975–1985): 170–180
Garry Kasparov (1985–2000): 180–190
Vladimir Kramnik (2000–2007): 170–180
Viswanathan Anand (2007–2013): 165–175
Magnus Carlsen (2013–2023): 190–200
Ding Liren (2023-Present): 170-180
The only person on this list known to have taken a professionally administered IQ test with publicly announced results was Kasparov, and his real IQ is at least 50 points lower than the figure you have pulled out of thin air.
Alright. What test did he take? WAIS? SBV? Neither of those were 3 days long. I don't think the test he took was any good.
Ziryab answered that question for you a couple of days ago; that fact that you can't remember that says a lot about your cognitive abilities. I'd estimate that your IQ is about 90.
Results of an actual test are a lot more believable than "estimates" from people who have never met the person in question.
90 IQ can't get into Mensa. LOL. For saying that, I'd have to estimate your IQ to be under 70.
Hi again Nepotamy.You can estimate I Q of people here on topic?
lots of coping on here
New Test...Simply be honest who do you identify with?
edited moderator AndrewSmith
he had an IQ of 160
Ty for data.I imagine the moment when serious profesionals looking the papers with evaluations of Albert and appearing suddenly the 160 Ducks in a row.It must have been very emotional.