wallows bot
Sort:
Thoughts on wallows bot
M
Unless I'm missing some obvious trick, there's no way this is a 1200 bot
He plays like a 1500 cuz usually I beat a 1200 bot but he’s not one of them
Where is this bot?
In the new
It took me several tries to beat it. It feels more like a 1500 to 1700. I'm sort of in a tilt right now though so my playing is off a bit. I did a knight sacrifice to pull its king out into the open. and then traded queens.
Today I played an 1800 and it seemed easier to beat than the Wallows Bot. It could be me though as my chess skills seem to change with the wind at times.
i think its 1500: it's tactics are not sharp
and hung a pawn on move 5
I think it’s 100 rated, I beat it easily
AyChess38 wrote:
I think it’s 100 rated, I beat it easily
Do it again and share the game here, I'd love to see it.
took me like 5-6 tries to beat it, def felt like at 1500-1700 bot. The game i beat it, it only gave it a 1000 rating tho 🤔
https://www.chess.com/game/computer/143343105
there aint no way this bot is 1200, feels like a 1700
WistfulPig wrote:
Unless I'm missing some obvious trick, there's no way this is a 1200 bot
it seems that with those promoted bots they have a displayed rating and a hidden real rating. that bot isnt 1200 for sure, just like previous promoted ones.
Could it be that cristinini is also rated lower than she is?
Objectively: I analysed 60 games against Wallows, he had an average rating of 1229.2 with standard deviation 292.3, minimum 600, maximum 1700, and median 1300 (50% of the times he played 1300 or more). A statistical test shows no evidence against the hypothesis that his true mean is 1200.
Subjectively: he seems better than other bots of the same rating.
