My reaction to this comment is: 👁️👄👁️ [human expression is initialized] don't worry fellow humans there are no bots here
OFFENSIVE LANGUAGE OF THE BOTS
Sort:
We need to add properly bots on our life respectfully.From R2D2, C3PO, WALL-E,BB -8,Rem ,Data, and many more on Sci Fi, we have precedents that we need respect bots and understand Machines.They are here to help us.
Well... you know, it's nothing personal. If a bot was programmed to respond to predetermined situations, in first place, it's nothing personal. First of all, it's about fun and, if you want, a little training. Maybe some people take it so seriously.I understand as sportistman. However, a benefit can also be obtained as a result of Bot training. I remember a childhood game in a group sitting in a circle, and a runner around circle throwing something back with his hand, like a package, and whoever received it was called "The rotten egg"... Rotten Egg takes the package and tries to returning the favor, while run. If not, he is now the circular runner looking for a new candidate to be the new Rotten egg.And other games haved names to signal individually to one loser, who always have the possibility to change and win. By laps in the game, everyone we all were named in one point the rotten egg, on middle of hilarant laughs and shouts. This denomination was under agreement previously of the game ...and being The rotten egg cause a need of awakening and get enough skilled to situation revert . I can imagine similar thing when a bot say to myself any thing and I laugh a lot.You know ,I can't be angry with C3PO or R2D2 ,cause i know on inner is Anthony Daniels and Kenny Baker, perhaps with wink from a gap in the metal cover...
GRECOvsNN wrote:
No? @sawdof is a bot
no. @miskit_mistake was a bot
Chappie
I love to play chess. anyone here who can beat me
Hiya If Bot here, be proud
I like the bots but agree we need to them to dig into even more offensive bot behaviors. Perhaps bots that abandon games. Offer draws repetitively. Or propose to show us pics.
TonkCatChess wrote:
I like the bots but agree we need to them to dig into even more offensive bot behaviors. Perhaps bots that abandon games. Offer draws repetitively. Or propose to show us pics.
Wanna see a pic?
Yes
GRECOvsNN wrote:
@Erik
Do you think this player is a bot? I find him very suspicious. I write to him about a specific topic and he always answers me with the same sentence regardless of what I am asking him. It's the same old dilemma: Are Elvis and Erik alive? I don't understand why bots are necessary in a chess website.
hes the founder of chess.com you dumbass
Bots were always on my mind... Bots were always on my mind...
A robot walks down the street and meets another robot. One says: Hey, where are you going. The other answers: To play a game of chess.
The Terminator tells John Connor in "The Judgament Day" that it is human nature to self-destruct. So, applied to chess, we just need to wait patiently for the opponent's risky moves?...Or is supposed human nature only a science fiction myth? I think we have two biotypes of players in humans usuaries1.Survivors and 2.daring players.But the most surprising thing is that a survivor can be a daring and vice versa on different games,depends of instincts that activate each game chances.Is popular to know two basic automatic reactions in humans in front of danger : Confront the danger or scape.In a boxing fight,one fighter that feel tyred can make unconsciently as reflex one posture similar to fetal teying to return to a security.A player on high risk can try agrupating all pieces I think as unvoluntary instinct to feel protection and protect the vital organ ,like head /king in board /.So,I suppose possible that excesive worry to keep king is a survival reflex.So, we can confront or put up with speech if is part of tactic /strategic of rival,Human or Robot.
You can mute the bots if you go to bot settings.
_
Hello !