More proof this site is rigged

I go on a big winning streak over days. Then all of a sudden I can't beat people 100 points lower. I am not changing my play. The opponent is not fatally blundering in the end.

This is not human play. Then chess.com sends this, more mind conditioning pyscho babble to make you think you aren't playing at your best. There is no rhyme or reason to give someone an absolute win where you don't learn something and then demolish in the next game.

Pair us up fairly and equally chess.com.

Grow up.

Why would a site need a preset message for their manipulation of pairings?

A human would have resigned.

low elo players like you and me shouldn't resign because our opponents can mess up and draw or even lose when winning. maybe they were praying for a stalemate.

That's BS. This "person" knew what they were doing. You can clearly see they were trying to get white in a stalemate position.

Then with mate in 1, they didn't resign even after waiting 3 minutes.

yes I know that they were trying to get stalemated. but that doesn't prove that they weren't human. them waiting 3 minutes could obviously mean that black is tilted and wants to waste your time because they're mad you beat them.

You are losing those games because you resign after move 3. Or move 1. Game after game after game.

https://www.chess.com/game/live/120906742520?username=thankfulforfreechess

https://www.chess.com/game/live/120906656564?username=thankfulforfreechess

https://www.chess.com/game/live/120906749972?username=thankfulforfreechess

That is a form of cheating, by the way.

I don't think the site is rigged, you should be thankful that if it is, the chess if free.

obviously he had something to do and just started a game. on what planet is losing a few games early cheating?

Idk why that account isn't banned yet.

Read the context of the thread, not the selective memory games you want to cherry pick. ALL the games are there. The huge winning streak that went on for days with suspicious fatal blunders. Then, games which were not resigned in less than 10 moves show players playing well above the highest rating. Also, bringing down the rating 50 points didn't change anything.

I would argue it is not a form of cheating, and it is not a form of sandbagging. I am not trying to win a prize or money for my performance. If I can go from 600 to 1400, I should be able to go from 800 to 1100.

i look at this forum and see: hmmm, this guy looks interesting

goes into his profile: what the f***?

you understand that the site isn't rigged when you purposefully lose game after game in less than ten moves?

The accounts are probably bots playing based on accuracy. Look you will see 2 games that went the same line. Very suspicious. This is evidence to show they are testing us to see if we are studying our games. Humans would not be playing the same line so soon.

That is five games you resigned in only one move.

I hope you understand that this is cheating right?

No, cheating would be using an engine and winning.

I thought this site was rigged from the start! I believe every person on this forum is a bot, to be specific an ai generated chatbot bought by the people who own this website. I signed into this because I saw a Rablax add and saw people on the forum talking about that add I just named. why cant I see it again? I wanna try Rablax but this website is full of people who only talk about chess. of course they'd only talk about chess, but if that's the case why a Rablax post on the forum? I wanna try Rablax.

You would think but rules are a bit different here at chess.com

So, we submit to a big hike in our rating based on stupid blunders in the end, then get demolished? I would prefer being paired evenly. This means some wins, some losses, on a daily basis.

How come we can join Swiss based tournaments and this happens, but when we randomly get paired we go on a week's winning streak? Answer, money money money. They want us to stay on the site. If we lost, then we might leave.

Then, they put out a family plan for 4 at $199. Well, how about just offering 1 account at $50? Money. They want more money than they deserve.