Out in the real world, no one has the foggiest idea who is the latest FIDE champion, or much cares. But quite a few people have heard of Magnus Carlsen, and find him a likeable guy who makes chess more interesting. The whole debacle makes FIDE look even sillier than normal (if that's possible) and brings the game into disrepute. Note to FIDE: It's not a great idea to have unnecessary and arbitrary rules whose enforcement hurts the enforcer.
Every player follows the same rules, including Magnus Carlsen, and even though he got disqualified, it shows that FIDE is not lenient and does not have any exceptions for more famous, experienced people, keeping their good reputation of a strict and non-bias organization. Looking into the scenario a bit deeper will give you the reason why they disqualified Magnus Carlsen for not abiding to the dress code.
Carlsen acted with no class (telling FIDE to f*** off, yeah, that's adult) - and he knows the rules. Some of them may be annoying but they are the rules, and if you can't follow them, stay home.
Out in the real world, no one has the foggiest idea who is the latest FIDE champion, or much cares. But quite a few people have heard of Magnus Carlsen, and find him a likeable guy who makes chess more interesting. The whole debacle makes FIDE look even sillier than normal (if that's possible) and brings the game into disrepute. Note to FIDE: It's not a great idea to have unnecessary and arbitrary rules whose enforcement hurts the enforcer.
Every player follows the same rules, including Magnus Carlsen, and even though he got disqualified, it shows that FIDE is not lenient and does not have any exceptions for more famous, experienced people, keeping their good reputation of a strict and non-bias organization. Looking into the scenario a bit deeper will give you the reason why they disqualified Magnus Carlsen for not abiding to the dress code.