My point is simply that if you enjoy playing a particular opening and want to play it, give it a try. In that way you can find out if it suits you and/or works for you. Regardless of what your skill level is. Don't necessarily eschew it because someone else doesn't like it...
is London the best chess opening?
When someone like Kramnik or Carlsen plays an opening, it becomes popular. The Berlin Defense to the Spanish was a nineteenth century opening until Kramnik started playing it, especially in the match that made him World Champion. As Magnus says, when he Kramnik played the London against him, he gave it more attention.
Kramnik’s flippant cheating accusations the past two years have soured me on the man, but it’s worth remembering that he is a strong player who has been very influential in chess opening fashions. Few players in history have had the depth of his positional understanding.
@RussBell
I'm not empty headed I do that. Also that is not your point your point is something about a famous player, now you're scratching that idea and making up something new. And Ziryab's right.
The point is that famous players don't risk playing bad openings in high level competition.
@RussBell
No, a person playing against MAGGIE played 1. b3! There are exceptions to most things in chess, what you said included.
Magnus Carlsen's opinion of the London System...
Excellent!
Of course, the richness of the opening requires a level of preparation and understanding to comprehend. Beginners don’t have that.
I'm a beginner, look at me, don't assume things because of a number.
It’s not personal or individual. I’ve coached beginners for a quarter century. I’ve taught more than 1000 children how to move the pieces and the basics of checkmate.
My suggestion on openings is that they play what Greco played, or what Morphy played. Most of them can tell you they’ve seen the Opera game, which is a terrific study of development and the contrast between the material on the board and the material in the battle.
These students would look at a typical London game and tell you that none of White’s pieces, except perhaps the rook are “eating pizza”, that is spectators rather than players.
Magnus Carlsen's opinion of the London System...
Excellent!
Of course, the richness of the opening requires a level of preparation and understanding to comprehend. Beginners don’t have that.
I'm a beginner, look at me, don't assume things because of a number.
It’s not personal or individual. I’ve coached beginners for a quarter century. I’ve taught more than 1000 children how to move the pieces and the basics of checkmate.
My suggestion on openings is that they play what Greco played, or what Morphy played. Most of them can tell you they’ve seen the Opera game, which is a terrific study of development and the contrast between the material on the board and the material in the battle.
These students would look at a typical London game and tell you that none of White’s pieces, except perhaps the rook are “eating pizza”, that is spectators rather than players.
Noobs in action.
I took on a new student ten months ago who plays the London. Gotham and others influenced him. He’s won some local youth tournaments.
We looked at the London together and I showed him how I play against it.
When a slightly stronger youth player beat him twice, he asked to learn some other openings.
People don't play an opening because it is the best. People play it because many people fall for it or because that opening suits their gameplay the best. I'm more of a defender than attacker in some openings and more of a attacker in some openings. For example, London System is defensive that rely on developing your pieces when Queen's Gambit is more aggresive and rely on having a good start with more developed pieces. KID rely on having a good pawn structure etc.
A beginner would probally play Fried Liver Attack or Wayward Queen Attack because they are popular and many people fall to the trap in beginning levels.
But masters are adaptive to most of the openings because they study bunch of openings and knows how to deal with them. So it wouldn't be much of a problem for masters.
A beginner would not notice the sneaky bishop when you play Polish Opening and lose the rook, but a master has a good board vision and they will save the rook. The same happened with me that's why I know.
For example; My favorite opening is Ruy Lopéz Opening: Berlin Defense, Rio Gambit Accepted because I like open games and I do not like complex games with complex pawn structures. I can't think about a move and get stressed when there is complex pawn structures and bad pieces. I would take the draw in a complex position when I am up a minor piece if i have time trouble. I can't win complex positions.
But if you like complex games, then you happily play the Advance Variation against French Defense.
That's why you have to find the best opening for you when you are beginning to chess. It is so important.
@ToastBread_1
Or by influence, or by accident, like stumbling on a cool variation. Ex. Giucco Piano, I play it a lot.
@RussBell
No, a person playing against MAGGIE played 1. b3! There are exceptions to most things in chess, what you said included.
1. b3 is not an bad opening, it is possibily on the top 10 opening moves out of 20.
And it doesn't mean that everyone will play the same if one did.
There is 8 master games with this move sequence:
And out of 8 games, only one resulted with black winning and rest are white win.
Magnus Carlsen's opinion of the London System...
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/U5PfHoFRZqc
Excellent!
Of course, the richness of the opening requires a level of preparation and understanding to comprehend. Beginners don’t have that.
I'm a beginner, look at me, don't assume things because of a number.