i think it depends on the player, I don't need one
Is hiring a coach really worth it?
Sort:
Is it worth the money? No
I think if you want to improve at a hobby it's not unreasonable to spend money to get better. Doesn't need to be a coach. Before I got a coach, I did all self learning from books.
Similar with me. I was stuck below 1000 for 8 years because i refused to do anything except listen to half-baked public lectures at my chess club. My dad would tell me to study chess, and I would bring out a Harry Potter book instead. But at 9 years old I had barely grasped logical thinking and I didn't really want to either. Finally started reading books and analyzing games at 14. Instantly became over 1000.
llama_l wrote:
Oh, also post mortems gave me some awesome tips... too bad these days it doesn't happen much anymore since people want to analyze on their phones.
Hearing someone's rationale, even if it's wrong in that specific instance, can introduce you to new and good ideas.
I've always had pretty good success with postmortems. I just ask if they want to look at the game afterwards. Then we'd take a board and setup the game, or if we're in a really scuffed place we'd just recite moves and thoughts.
AngelicNightcore wrote:
ive found myself stuck for the last 2 years in the 800's and I'm wondering if a coach is the best solution
It depends on your situation and if you believe this will be worth it for you. If you have more spending money and are more serious about chess improvement, then hiring a coach becomes more and more beneficial. If you don't have a lot to spend, or play chess as a hobby, then hiring a chess coach becomes less worth it for you.
If you are around 800 rating, then I believe that there is much you can still learn on your own. The only reason I'd consider hiring a coach at this level is if you are concerned about reinforcing bad habits.
We can play some unrated live chess for learning sometime @AngelicNightcore I don't mind helping my chess friends 
Because you haven’t said what you have already tried, I cannot say whether a coach would be worth it.
i am naturally cheap, so I would look at other learning tools before hiring a coach. What chess books are in your library? Read every one of them.
Does your city have a chess club? Play there. Watch the games of the stronger players. Listen to them analyze their games. After you lose, ask your opponent for a post-mortem.
there are also many free resources online. But as a previous poster wrote, you will still have to work in order to apply a lesson in a video or in a coaching session. One of the mistakes that I see people make on this site is to think that some videos or a video course will do the work for them.
llama_l wrote:
My last few games we didn't analyze, but also the games went the full time, so we didn't really have time to do it.
Analyzing without a board is fun, you get to show off to lower rated players if they can't do it but of course it's a lot harder to see tactics blindfolded (at least for me).
oh yeah you sure do get to show off lol, but then you get nothing done. If there's no space and their rating isn't high I'm not going to really bother to analyze outside of some positions from long thinks. Most people do tend to remember vaguely those positions and ideas.
Post-mortem analyses are great. Much better than just using Stockfish on your phone.
stockfish can point out an opening mistake or a calculational error in a tactical sequence. However, it does not explain how a long-term positional plan should be carried out. Or why one positional plan is better than another. This is where learning from a good chess commentator or a good post-mortem comes in.
Watch YouTube.
Free of cost, available any time, quality of content is good.
ive found myself stuck for the last 2 years in the 800's and I'm wondering if a coach is the best solution