Forums

if u start late, you can't improve

Sort:
yamauchiExpelled

Just give UP

Jahtreezy

Counterpoint: you can improve whenever you put the effort in to improve.

ChishTheFish
Am I?
BasixWhiteBoy
I could never be that bad at chess to close my account and give up and create a new alt account the next day.
bobby_max
toga_ochakoCP wrote:

It's okay to give up. He closed his account. If you don't have the right brain, you can't improve. If you stay in the 800s for years, you're clearly not cut out for chess.

I notice you're been in the 1800s for quite a while. I don't see a lot of improvement going on in your games. Maybe you're the one that's not "cut out for chess". I don't see a title attached to your screen name. Based on your non-improvement, maybe you should quit. It seems you just suck at a slightly higher level. I saw a 2800 player on Chessbrahs wipe the floor with an 1800 recently, 10-0. So don't get so worked up about yourself.

ChishTheFish
idk whether I’m improving :/
Jahtreezy
toga_ochakoCP wrote:

It's okay to give up. He closed his account. If you don't have the right brain, you can't improve. If you stay in the 800s for years, you're clearly not cut out for chess.

Only agree with the first part (if you don't want to study it right now, you can take your time, leave and come back, whatever).

But there's this thing on the chess forums where people equate intelligence/capability with ELO, or make an argument from ELO, and it's really grating.

ChessMasteryOfficial

Progress may be slower if you start later, but it’s absolutely possible to get better with consistent effort and the right mindset.

borovicka75
Harry Nelson Pillsbury (1872 - 1906) learned chess in 17. Six years later he won superturnament in Hastings ahead of world elite including Steinitz and Lasker.