I sacrificed my queen!

https://www.chess.com/analysis/game/daily/673463179?tab=reviewhttps://www.chess.com/analysis/game/daily/673463179?tab=review

Everyone pls watch this! I sacrificed my queen with 1158 rating.I was losing but then...

pls see this

low quality game and very obvious tactic, nothing to be proud about

Great job

If you don't have anything good to say, don't say it. Even if it is to lower his ego. Also, of coarse you call it "low quality", you are a 2600 puzzles.

2600 puzzles is kinda bad to be honest. Maybe they would be better if they didn't spend all their time insulting people in forums.

Finding a brilliancy is always fun, nice job. Yes you could have played better, but you still won and that deserves praise.

Titled players exist, people above 1500 exist. There have been YouTube blogs about people who have crossed 2000. I myself am in the top two percent of all players. Just because you can't doesn't mean others can't either.

See comment #10. Yes, it's not difficult to spot. No, you shouldn't be knocking someone just because you don't like how brilliant moves are classified. Yes, you should have the class and common decency to just compliment their find and move on.

Ok thanks everyone who supported me.But in the game below I found a brilliant sacrifice that was not a all obvious.I sacrificed the bishop for two pawns and won a rook shortly after.Look at this.

You also can't say that this is a low quality game because I played much higher than my rating.I am roughly 1220 and played like a 1600.

https://www.chess.com/analysis/game/daily/680213667?tab=review

How no sacrifice? I sacced the bishop for two pawns destroying his castling pawn structure to win a rook.See that pls.And thanks for saying I played 96 percent accuracy.But why does daily 1220 not matter?

somebody

There was a sacrifice, and the rating does matter. Congrats. Also, I saw about 85% accuracy on the game, but it was still pretty nice.

ok

move 18 bxh3