Forums

i am icc fischer

Sort:
cap78red

I got a 2427 performance in a rapidplay event in lancaster (OTB) in february -see i am the icc fischer

ElectricGuitarIsCool
Dude then why dont you have a 2427 chesscom rating?
cap78red
Malmsbury wrote:
Dude then why dont you have a 2427 chesscom rating?

because everyone cheats

cap78red

RealGojira

Here is your standard games otb record since the ECF rating conversion aggregated by class. Very much in line statistically with the 16xx OTB player you are. you are expected to occasionally get a lucky win against a 2000. You are not ICC Fischer (unless you created that identity...) and did not play Nigel Short, much less beat him.

Note, I'm not woofing, I'm not much better, just calling out a blowhard. Haughty proud virus is indeed all around.

      g w l d pct perf rating  
unrated / <1200 10 7 0 3 0.85 1480    
1200-1399   6 4 1 1 0.75 1500    
1400-1599   43 21 8 13 0.64 1621    
1600-1799   47 12 22 13 0.39 1615    
1800-1999   17 3 11 3 0.26 1712    
2000-2199   11 1 9 1 0.14 1809    
2200-2399   1 0 1 0 0 1800    
>2400   0 0 0 0        
  TOTALS   135 48 52 34 0.48 1631    
GabeMiami10

Thanks for doing the research 5

cap78red

nov04-inactive
cap78red wrote:
Malmsbury wrote:
Dude then why dont you have a 2427 chesscom rating?

because everyone cheats

stop capping even if they cheat you get your points back

nov04-inactive

your games are soo bad you blunder so easily even in rapid

BigChessplayer665
cap78red wrote:
Malmsbury wrote:
Dude then why dont you have a 2427 chesscom rating?

because everyone cheats

Cap im 2200 and I don't cheat just skill issue

cap78red

i was a 2350 online player from 1997-2001 before computers were so good

nov04-inactive
cap78red wrote:

i was a 2350 online player from 1997-2001 before computers were so good

dudes highest was 1700

BigChessplayer665
cap78red wrote:

i was a 2350 online player from 1997-2001 before computers were so good

1997 is not the same as 2024 plus chess com wasn't even around then so in reality you were 2370 on a different website if at all

Which could correlate to 1700 on chess.com also moderntimes are different everyone gets better even faster

cap78red
nov04-inactive wrote:
cap78red wrote:

i was a 2350 online player from 1997-2001 before computers were so good

dudes highest was 1700

I was 2350 on kasparovs site 1997-2000 then went on Internet chess club around 2000 and still had a 2350 rating for a year. On the internet chess club they had power outages in around 2005 which lost all the data from before 2005

BigChessplayer665
cap78red wrote:
nov04-inactive wrote:
cap78red wrote:

i was a 2350 online player from 1997-2001 before computers were so good

dudes highest was 1700

I was 2350 on kasparovs site 1997-2000 then went on Internet chess club around 2000 and still had a 2350 rating for a year. On the internet chess club they had power outages in around 2005 which lost all the data from before 2005

If everyone cheats how do I beat everyone then 😏

So your 2300 on random chess website not chess.com got it 👍

cap78red

before computers 2600 fide people had standard ratings of 2350 on the icc

BigChessplayer665
cap78red wrote:

before computers 2600 fide people had standard ratings of 2350 on the icc

On chess.com 2600 is like 2800-2900+ blitz chess... If your seriously "2600" fida strength then you have a serious skill issue

Jenium
cap78red wrote:

Not sure why you bring this up to prove that you were a strong player. 6 wins in a row against 1600 players is not uncommon when having a good tournament. A screenshot of your 2350 rating in the 5 min pool on ICC would be more impressive.

cap78red

they were 1600 elo english chess rating but many were 1900 fide

Skiisz

1900 fide, not impressive. just coz u have a performance rating of 2427 or whatever does not mean anything! ur 1600chesscom bro.