That's not great because there are better moves.
How is this not a great move?
Sort:
jackityjackjack wrote:
That's not great because there are better moves.
True…
jackityjackjack wrote:
That's not great because there are better moves.
That is not a valid argument in the slightest...smh
If you were to go by that logic, you could say that Magnus Carlsen is not a good chess player because he's not the world champion. See how stupid that sounds? 🤷🏻♂️
Fr3nchToastCrunch wrote:
jackityjackjack wrote:
That's not great because there are better moves.
That is not a valid argument in the slightest...smh
If you were to go by that logic, you could say that Magnus Carlsen is not a good chess player because he's not the world champion. See how stupid that sounds? 🤷🏻♂️
That’s what I’m saying, it isn’t the best move, but it still wins a queen.
Yep, but a great move most also be best.
Fr3nchToastCrunch wrote:
jackityjackjack wrote:
That's not great because there are better moves.
That is not a valid argument in the slightest...smh
If you were to go by that logic, you could say that Magnus Carlsen is not a good chess player because he's not the world champion. See how stupid that sounds? 🤷🏻♂️
I'm didn't say this wasn't a good move, I said it wasn't a Great! move. It's good in my book, and innacuracy in the engine's.
Fr3nchToastCrunch wrote:
jackityjackjack wrote:
That's not great because there are better moves.
That is not a valid argument in the slightest...smh
If you were to go by that logic, you could say that Magnus Carlsen is not a good chess player because he's not the world champion. See how stupid that sounds? 🤷🏻♂️
it is a valid argument because it is a computer rating the moves and there is only so many factors you can program it to account for in order for it to make judgements about 'great' moves.
great moves are roughly defined as when you basically have one good move and you played it.
jackityjackjack wrote:
Fr3nchToastCrunch wrote:
jackityjackjack wrote:
That's not great because there are better moves.
That is not a valid argument in the slightest...smh
If you were to go by that logic, you could say that Magnus Carlsen is not a good chess player because he's not the world champion. See how stupid that sounds? 🤷🏻♂️
I'm didn't say this wasn't a good move, I said it wasn't a Great! move. It's good in my book, and innacuracy in the engine's.
this is the part where you stop caring about the engines opinion because
1. your move was simple
2. it made winning easier
so it's good enough
Stockfish says I missed mate-in-9 but still, I WIN A QUEEN. How is this not a great move…