as per my experience chesskid rating is more realiastic than chess.com. Because on chess.com i can beat any of around 1400 or 1500 easily. but on chesskid opponent with 1200 would be more tougher. I feel like chesskid rating is around 100 or 200 +-. and it is more near to your actual rating.
diffrence between chesskid and chess.com ratings
Sort:
Kids are known to be hundreds of points above their ratings in strenght. Perhaps that's why?
It is much tougher to get higher ratings on chesskid because there are very few higher rated playing.
Yeah,i would say the chesskid ratings are about 500 points deflated. My chesskid rating is 1504 and although my chess.com rapid is only 1400 or so i really only play against stockfish and comp20 which are about 2400. But i beat 1800s most of the time.
but on chess.com I cant even beat an 1000 and I can beat a 1200 on chess kid
My Chesskid rating is 1450 and my chess.com rating is 900
how my chesskid rating is 1250 but my chess.com rating is 645
I don't use chesskid, so I wouldn't know.
I am 700 in chess.com and 1600 in chesskid so idk
im 1700 chess.com but 2300 chesskid so ..
Im 1100 on chesskid
my chesskid rating is 1500 and my chess.com rating is 650 whats wrong here
I played a 1100 chess.kid and beat him twice but I’m 1000 on chess.com so the chess kid ratings are actually kind of buffed
heloimnew wrote:
im 1700 chess.com but 2300 chesskid so ..
I severely doubt you are 2300 on chesskid, whats your username?
im 1100 on chess kid but I'm 200 on chess.com
700 chess com 1200 chesskid still going up
On chess.com you start off (or use to) with a rating of 1200 and after 2 or so games when you establish a firm grrasp of what your rating might be it's still 300-400 higher than what your actuall OTB rating might be. On chesskid.com you start off with a 600 rating but I don't know the diffrence between them to give a guest from what I've seen the ratings are 400-500 below what someones real rating might be but wanted to know if someone already knew the answer to this question.