Forums

Bullet on Elo below 2k is just dumb and useless, change my mind

Sort:
wander_falke

below 1k its 99,9% timewin based on lag and luck, above until 2k+ probably 99% ....

by allowing streamersimps to play bullet youre just [messing] up the playerbase, oh damn , its about money, ok ........ hmmmmm, ok........., what to do now, hmmmmm, ok, nothing because money, thx america

justbefair
wander_falke wrote:

below 1k its 99,9% timewin based on lag and luck, above until 2k+ probably 99% ....

by allowing streamersimps to play bullet youre just [messing] up the playerbase, oh damn , its about money, ok ........ hmmmmm, ok........., what to do now, hmmmmm, ok, nothing because money, thx america

What difference does it make if your rating is below 1000?

It seems likely that you are upset that your rating keeps dropping. That is normal when you are new.

At some point, your rating will stop dropping and you will start winning about half of your games.

/ 99.9% of the 18 million active bullet players are rated below 2000.

I assume they just play for fun....

There is no money involved.

CBTVET
exactly
Zardorian
Arguments for bullet chess for players below 2000 ELO:

Sharpening tactical vision and pattern recognition: Bullet chess offers a rapid-fire environment to practice spotting tactical opportunities and threats, enhancing pattern recognition and intuitive decision-making skills.
Fun and challenging: Bullet chess can be an exciting and stimulating experience, adding a dose of adrenaline and quick decision-making to the traditional chess experience.
Specific skill practice: Bullet chess can be used to practice specific tactical motifs and endgame skills in a fast-paced setting, potentially aiding improvement in those areas.
Ultimately, whether or not bullet chess is "useless" for players below 2000 ELO depends on individual goals and learning styles. If your focus is on long-term improvement in overall chess skill and understanding, classic chess and slower time controls might be more beneficial. However, if you enjoy the fast-paced thrill of bullet chess and want to focus on sharpening specific skills like tactics and pattern recognition, it can still be a valuable tool.
monkeybumuser

no i good

Blake_Bentley

Not to be rude but you might not be in a place to comment on this topic (I don't claim to either).

monkeybumuser

www.indeed.com

ashvasan
Zardorian wrote:

Arguments for bullet chess for players below 2000 ELO:

Sharpening tactical vision and pattern recognition: Bullet chess offers a rapid-fire environment to practice spotting tactical opportunities and threats, enhancing pattern recognition and intuitive decision-making skills.
Fun and challenging: Bullet chess can be an exciting and stimulating experience, adding a dose of adrenaline and quick decision-making to the traditional chess experience.
Specific skill practice: Bullet chess can be used to practice specific tactical motifs and endgame skills in a fast-paced setting, potentially aiding improvement in those areas.
Ultimately, whether or not bullet chess is "useless" for players below 2000 ELO depends on individual goals and learning styles. If your focus is on long-term improvement in overall chess skill and understanding, classic chess and slower time controls might be more beneficial. However, if you enjoy the fast-paced thrill of bullet chess and want to focus on sharpening specific skills like tactics and pattern recognition, it can still be a valuable tool

But most people who are below 1500 are not serious, they just lay for fun
1500-2000 your statement is mostly true