At what rating can you call yourself a pro?

I am 1650 and I have a long way to become a pro. I think 2200 is good.

i am 2400 yet i think thats garbage mostly cause i am hard on my chess, if i am not at least 2000 OTB or near master level i always consider my ratings online as "not good enough"

I am talking about rapid ratings

i am 2200 then i still consider it garbage

😮

I'd consider any titled chess player a "pro" and this is primarily because of status and level of chess insight required to reach those titles. 

@Kowarenai it also isn't about rating where you feel garbage or not because even titled players sometimes feel like their chess play is trash. It is a case of "the grass is always greener on the other side of the fence." 

Here is Levy calling his own chess play trash 

(disclaimer, video has language but isn't severe enough to be 18+, so watch at your own caution, but if that doesn't bother you, then this isn't too bad)

I think you're a "pro" when you're making money playing chess (winning tournaments, events, etc. not hustling in the park for money).  Or if you're a titled player.  I don't think rating alone constitutes professional.

ok

There are (basically) no pros playing rapid ratings online. 2200 rapid is good, sure, but it doesn't go much higher than that. That's close to the top. When you're that good you have to switch to blitz, which goes up to 3200-3300 on chess.com.

Pros should be able to get over 3000 in 3|0.

100 elo pro 99 nope

1800 Classical FIDE rating should be good enough to call yourself professional

Titled players are able to play in amateur tournaments if they do not get paid to play. "The term "pro" is not defined by your Elo.

Pro is when chess is your job. So GM I think

You think wrong. Many people who are not GMs make a living off of chess and, thus, are pros. And many GMs dont make any money from chess and, thus, are not pros.

If you win money in a fide tournament you're at least semi-pro