Are the bot characters’ ELO ratings accurate?
I just win 1200, 1600 and 2000 rating AI coaches. With 3 stars. And my rating is 940 and I sill have a problem to win 1200 rating real people. Either bots are mega weak or majority of people ratings in chess.com ar fake.
I just win 1200, 1600 and 2000 rating AI coaches. With 3 stars. And my rating is 940 and I sill have a problem to win 1200 rating real people. Either bots are mega weak or majority of people ratings in chess.com ar fake.
bro i'm literally 300 and beat 1300 easy
I'm a mid 1100 and I beat Jonas - 1700 - and drew Isla - 1700 -, both in difficult positions, as well as beat Isabel - 1600 - in 6 moves. So no, the ELO is not realistic. To be fair, I'm strong for a mid 1100.
You should always think of checks, captures, and attacks.
Then, you should think about your opponents' threats.
I am stuck at around 450 playing against real people but somehow just beat the Antonio bot who is 1500. What is wrong with me?
I am 292 rated and I usually grind on Elani a lot and I have been checking my games and the engine always says Elani is 100 rated when she actually is 400.
perhaps, humans are far too strong now, compared to the standards.. you know this cuz there is a frickin 13 year old kid who is a grandmaster , while im still here blundering pieces....
ps. i can defeat nelson but Antonio is been givin me a hard time. ive come back after a long break and im having a losing streak of 20 games
No way, I'm literally >200 elo but I'm beating 1500 bots