Forums

How would an interesting move be calculated?

Sort:
Minceraft_7474

Chess.com has the normal moves, like Blunder, Mistake, Inaccuracy, Book, Good, Excellent, Best, Great and Brilliant. (what a mouthful) So how would an interesting move be calculatedd, or does anyone have a good example? 

sgrcatering

Calculating an interesting move involves analyzing several factors to determine its potential impact. First, assess the strategic objectives and goals associated with the move. Evaluate the context, including current conditions and available resources. Consider the possible outcomes and their probabilities, as well as any risks involved. Use analytical tools and models to quantify potential benefits and drawbacks. Additionally, incorporate feedback from stakeholders and experts to refine the decision. This comprehensive approach ensures that the move is both impactful and aligned with overall strategic aims.

chessyay12345678
sgrcatering wrote:

Calculating an interesting move involves analyzing several factors to determine its potential impact. First, assess the strategic objectives and goals associated with the move. Evaluate the context, including current conditions and available resources. Consider the possible outcomes and their probabilities, as well as any risks involved. Use analytical tools and models to quantify potential benefits and drawbacks. Additionally, incorporate feedback from stakeholders and experts to refine the decision. This comprehensive approach ensures that the move is both impactful and aligned with overall strategic aims.

that sounds like ai also it's not related to chess

ChessMasteryOfficial

An interesting move might also be one that poses difficult problems for the opponent, even if it’s not technically the best move. For example, a surprising sacrifice or a move that appears strange but creates unexpected threats or traps.

DefinitelynotMax-0

hi

Superplayer7472

The engine is not yet appropiate to give moves a !? note. Only humans can understand when a move is "interesting", meaning it's practically strong but objectively dubious.

chessyay12345678
Superplayer7472 wrote:

The engine is not yet appropiate to give moves a !? note.

They do, just not the engine you use on this website.

vishnumadhav

Some of them doesn't make sense.

jeelop69

How

RimazTarade

How

VedangPathare98

How

EDRIC2409
DefinitelynotMax-0 wrote:

hi

Hi

basketstorm

Today I've got an interesting move (not on chess.com though), here knight takes bishop on d5 and the analyzer said it's an interesting move: