Forums

Why is everyone low rated so ridiculously good?

Sort:
BigChessplayer665
lakshya988 wrote:

I used to play on chess.com when I was new to chess but then I started playing on lichess and improved a lot and i came back to chess.com and my rating is super low my friend his rating is 1000 and I can easily beat him so it there anything I can do to change my rating

Friends are easier to beat than random pool

JankogajdoskoLEGM

Abolish ELO

BigChessplayer665
JankogajdoskoLEGM wrote:

Abolish ELO

No u Smurf buddy

JankogajdoskoLEGM
BigChessplayer665 wrote:
JankogajdoskoLEGM wrote:

Abolish ELO

No u Smurf buddy

Stop bully mE bigchess alll you do is accuse and bully Im legit PLayer FM+LEGM extraordinaire opressed by RIgged Game system, Server room matrix and AI ELO gatekeepers, Stop bully

Im the victim here!!!!!!!!!!

Alex_Brainless

No pain - no gain, bro! :strong

HangingPiecesChomper

200s and 2000s on this site are practically the same thing. ratings are rigged.

EasyJayChess

I noticed a definite change in quality of play starting around 900 EL(O. When I started, chess.com assigned me a rapid rating of 400. I got slapped around as I learned to play and fell into the 300s. Now I just play Daily games, which fits my goals and schedule better. Anyways, by mid-900s I found that there was a big jump in quality of play. Blunders became rare and players definitely know more opening variations.

BigChessplayer665
EasyJayChess wrote:

I noticed a definite change in quality of play starting around 900 EL(O. When I started, chess.com assigned me a rapid rating of 400. I got slapped around as I learned to play and fell into the 300s. Now I just play Daily games, which fits my goals and schedule better. Anyways, by mid-900s I found that there was a big jump in quality of play. Blunders became rare and players definitely know more opening variations.

It's easier to make people blunder when you get into higher ratings it's not rare it's prob just that you don't know how to make the position difficult yet

BigChessplayer665
HangingPiecesChomper wrote:

200s and 2000s on this site are practically the same thing. ratings are rigged.

You mean cause you cheat

HangingPiecesChomper
BigChessplayer665 wrote:
HangingPiecesChomper wrote:

200s and 2000s on this site are practically the same thing. ratings are rigged.

You mean cause you cheat

the only cheater here is you. I've looked at the accuracy at some of your games and you literally play like an engine.

OutOfCheese

Did Kramnik make everyone a finagle detection expert?

kklyle

Did they play the Queen's Gambit on you? These openings require a well-timed dxc4. Play the ChessMaster and you will realize it's not easy. I beated my National Master chess coach (NM) using a symmetrical English opening, and I won with a Queenside expansion, he had central play.

I also won on time. (I was Black, he was White). Over-the-board with kids spectating! Ouch, considering the 2002 Junior Orange Bowl Chess Scholastic Championship in Florida, and the 2003 World Open in Philadelphia.

BigChessplayer665
HangingPiecesChomper wrote:
BigChessplayer665 wrote:
HangingPiecesChomper wrote:

200s and 2000s on this site are practically the same thing. ratings are rigged.

You mean cause you cheat

the only cheater here is you. I've looked at the accuracy at some of your games and you literally play like an engine.

Actually accuracy doesn't matter at all but whatever 🤷 you can think what you want to think but a 99% win rate.... Nah

Either that or your procrastinating on gaining elo and would be like a 2600 ishs Smurf 🤷 a 2400 and having no 95+ percent games is kinda sus (either because of a draw or your opponent Gave you a free piece earlier )

HangingPiecesChomper

Trying to blatantly lie by saying accuracy doesn't matter at all after getting caught?

Accuracy is how close your moves match the engine buddy.

I knew something was up after you kept accusing me nonstop.

BigChessplayer665
HangingPiecesChomper wrote:

Trying to blatantly lie by saying accuracy doesn't matter at all after getting caught?

Accuracy is how close your moves match the engine buddy.

I knew something was up after you kept accusing me nonstop.

No you just brag to much which makes you sus

Besides accuracy is biased like game review

BigChessplayer665

You can't defend yourself by attacking your opponent back lol

JankogajdoskoLEGM
BigChessplayer665 wrote:

You can't defend yourself by attacking your opponent back lol

Stop bully so much? Why you bully?

BigChessplayer665
JankogajdoskoLEGM wrote:
BigChessplayer665 wrote:

You can't defend yourself by attacking your opponent back lol

Stop bully so much? Why you bully?

Shh im not bullying you take that as a win