I used to play on chess.com when I was new to chess but then I started playing on lichess and improved a lot and i came back to chess.com and my rating is super low my friend his rating is 1000 and I can easily beat him so it there anything I can do to change my rating
Friends are easier to beat than random pool
Abolish ELO
Abolish ELO
No u Smurf buddy
Abolish ELO
No u Smurf buddy
Stop bully mE bigchess alll you do is accuse and bully Im legit PLayer FM+LEGM extraordinaire opressed by RIgged Game system, Server room matrix and AI ELO gatekeepers, Stop bully
Im the victim here!!!!!!!!!!
No pain - no gain, bro! :strong
200s and 2000s on this site are practically the same thing. ratings are rigged.
I noticed a definite change in quality of play starting around 900 EL(O. When I started, chess.com assigned me a rapid rating of 400. I got slapped around as I learned to play and fell into the 300s. Now I just play Daily games, which fits my goals and schedule better. Anyways, by mid-900s I found that there was a big jump in quality of play. Blunders became rare and players definitely know more opening variations.
I noticed a definite change in quality of play starting around 900 EL(O. When I started, chess.com assigned me a rapid rating of 400. I got slapped around as I learned to play and fell into the 300s. Now I just play Daily games, which fits my goals and schedule better. Anyways, by mid-900s I found that there was a big jump in quality of play. Blunders became rare and players definitely know more opening variations.
It's easier to make people blunder when you get into higher ratings it's not rare it's prob just that you don't know how to make the position difficult yet
200s and 2000s on this site are practically the same thing. ratings are rigged.
You mean cause you cheat
200s and 2000s on this site are practically the same thing. ratings are rigged.
You mean cause you cheat
the only cheater here is you. I've looked at the accuracy at some of your games and you literally play like an engine.
Did Kramnik make everyone a finagle detection expert?
Did they play the Queen's Gambit on you? These openings require a well-timed dxc4. Play the ChessMaster and you will realize it's not easy. I beated my National Master chess coach (NM) using a symmetrical English opening, and I won with a Queenside expansion, he had central play.
I also won on time. (I was Black, he was White). Over-the-board with kids spectating! Ouch, considering the 2002 Junior Orange Bowl Chess Scholastic Championship in Florida, and the 2003 World Open in Philadelphia.
200s and 2000s on this site are practically the same thing. ratings are rigged.
You mean cause you cheat
the only cheater here is you. I've looked at the accuracy at some of your games and you literally play like an engine.
Actually accuracy doesn't matter at all but whatever 🤷 you can think what you want to think but a 99% win rate.... Nah
Either that or your procrastinating on gaining elo and would be like a 2600 ishs Smurf 🤷 a 2400 and having no 95+ percent games is kinda sus (either because of a draw or your opponent Gave you a free piece earlier )
Trying to blatantly lie by saying accuracy doesn't matter at all after getting caught?
Accuracy is how close your moves match the engine buddy.
I knew something was up after you kept accusing me nonstop.
Trying to blatantly lie by saying accuracy doesn't matter at all after getting caught?
Accuracy is how close your moves match the engine buddy.
I knew something was up after you kept accusing me nonstop.
No you just brag to much which makes you sus
Besides accuracy is biased like game review
You can't defend yourself by attacking your opponent back lol
You can't defend yourself by attacking your opponent back lol
Stop bully so much? Why you bully?
Another thing worth mentioning is with such a day over day influx of players maybe rating is not the best guage of improvement in the short term. Ask yourself if your current self could beat a version of yourself from a month or year ago.
It's critical to recognize that daily player influx can make ratings less accurate for instant progress. Instead, focus on personal growth and ask yourself if your current skills surpass those of a month or a year ago. Improvement isn't always reflected in ratings. Reflecting on your own development can provide a clearer picture of progress over time.