I'm currently at Wally, he is rated 1800. I could draw but not win yet.
One thing i realized that they don't know well-known endgame checkmate patterns like R+K against a King. Idk about the ones any above Wally.
I'm currently at Wally, he is rated 1800. I could draw but not win yet.
One thing i realized that they don't know well-known endgame checkmate patterns like R+K against a King. Idk about the ones any above Wally.
I had Nelson on the ropes, but I screwed up the endgame. I found he's a bit of a one trick pony and you can neutralize him to a great degree by taking away his trick (his queen, for which I had to trade mine). He's still not entirely incompetent though or he would've let me get away with blundering towards the end.
I'm currently at Wally, he is rated 1800. I could draw but not win yet.
One thing i realized that they don't know well-known endgame checkmate patterns like R+K against a King. Idk about the ones any above Wally.
At this point I'm just trying to draw Wally because I cannot beat him yet, or get even close.
I have beaten Wally (1800 elo). Somehow, that game I played extremely well and had 96% accuracy, making no inaccuracies, mistakes, or blunders. He usually beats me, though. My highest rating was 1200, but I don't play much and have recently started playing chess after months of not playing, so my rating is probably not reliable.
Won against 10 yo Magnus in Magnus App and draw against the 11. But I took my time for every move and played conservative games.
I'm currently at Wally, he is rated 1800. I could draw but not win yet.
One thing i realized that they don't know well-known endgame checkmate patterns like R+K against a King. Idk about the ones any above Wally.
At this point I'm just trying to draw Wally because I cannot beat him yet, or get even close.
finally i killed him, he's dead x_x
https://www.chess.com/forum/view/game-showcase/end-of-wallys-reign
a few notes for you, he is good at tactics but bad at long term strategies.. like pawn structures, weak squares etc.. you can also inspect my game though
I am 1360 and have beaten the Li (2000) bot, as well as the Wally (1800) bot in a very close endgame, hes pretty tough. The Isabel (1600) bot plays so much better than both of these bots for some odd reason and I am yet to beat her.
Really? I find Isabel not too hard too beat, but not necessarily easy. I'm 1048 rapid and I'm not sure I'll ever beat Wally.
My rating is 1860 odd rapid , I don't play here much but I have beaten Francis(2300) and Noam(2200). Although I found Francis easier than Noam. I drew against Danny(2500) few times and I played without any takebacks or hint against all of them
Check out my blog (https://chess.com/blog/GrunkleMike), where I detail my bot battles. It took me six weeks and about 200 games to beat Wally, then I beat the next five higher bots in a week! Now I'm stuck on Li.
I'm 1200-1300 rapid and it took me ages to beat Wally (1800). I've drawn against Julia. The problem I've found is that the bots are very good at digging out of bad positions or engineering a draw even when you gain a significant advantage. If you're up a bishop or a knight (or, in one of my draws, two knights), it's not enough. You have to keep pushing for a greater advantage.