What's your chess.com rating and what's the highest rated bot you've beaten?
Sort:
So my rating (I play mostly rapid) is upper 600s. But I just beat Laura (1100) for the second time in a row. Yet when I play a person around my rating level, I feel like I'm barely hanging on.
Bots are kind of weird. They'll move with great accuracy then make the strangest mistake or blunder out of nowhere. So I know their rating is at least a little inaccurate.
But with that said, what's your rating and what's the highest rated bot you've beaten?
1800 rapid and 1880 beth bot. I believe I can drop the 2000 one, but haven't yet spent the time. They are over-rated a bit. Its like they are programmed to drop a piece every 10th move or something.
I'm rated 1125 (blitz) and 1647 (daily). I've beaten every bot up to Jonas (1700) so far working down the list of bots. So that does include Natasha (2000) but I think that her being adaptive helped me. They are definitely overrated!
I do find the higher rated bots I've played so far quite useful for learning openings though and have already learned a couple of gambits.
I only beat the 1600 Isabel, I came close to defeating dash multiple times but....
I've defeated all the beginner and intermediate bots through Mateo (1400). I had the 1600 Beth Harmon easily beaten and screwed up and stalemated. Rookie mistake!
I don’t play bots really but a while back I beat a 1800 bot
My chess.com blitz rating is around 2300 and my rapid rating on here is around 2240. Highest-rated bot I have defeated so far was the Beth Harmon bot at age 20 with a claimed strength of 2500 (which I think is 100-200 points higher than her actual strength based on a couple of games I played with her a while back). My record against said bot is 1-1.
My rating is in the low 1200s (in bullet), and the best bot I've beaten is Wally-Bot. (1800) I'm trying to work my way up to defeating 1880 Beth now.
1000 rapid vs 1800 bot.
2351, never played a bot.
My rating is 499 rapid (bad ik ik) and i've beaten a 1,100 around 4-5 times (think his name is sven or something). gothamchess brings up a good point. they do perfectly okay moves, sometimes the best move, and then blunder their queen out of nowhere. it's not a good way to measure your skill. only really good for practicing tactics and cool attacking ideas on someone who won't easily allow you to do it.
1291 rapid, 2000 adaptive and 1880 normal. I beated max 3200 (level 25 engine) if you count timeouts.
About 1500 rapid and have beaten Beth 1600. I've got some videos of how to beat a few of the bots, happy to do more!
I'm about 800 and I've beaten Nelson, 1300.
I’m also about 800 (rapid) and have beaten Nelson
rapid 600 beat nelson
Rapid rating of 900-ish here in chess.com and having fun consistently beating Antonio (1,500 bot) with no hint and no take backs. It really likes playing Ruy Lopez as White and French Defense or sometimes, Sicilian, as Black.
I have not been able to adopt it yet though so I haven’t yet tried playing Isabel.
I’m not sure exactly how the AI decides the difficulty it plays when a game starts. There was one time I had chess.com analyzed a game that I played against Antonio. I felt that I played like Bobby Fischer in that game lol ... turned out that I played 77% accuracy and the bot played 9% accuracy lol 😆🤣😂
But the highest bot rating I’ve ever beaten is Claudia, a bot in Chess24. It adopted me until I beat it after it lowered its rating to over 1,700 (she started with a rating of just under 2,000). I didn’t try the next bot after it because it was the 10 yr old Magnus Carlsen lol 😆
I'm 1055 Rapid, but I've beaten every bot from 1700 and below. I make rookie mistakes against the 1800 guy but I think I'll have him someday
I think 1600 and below you can just play forced draw openings and win due to them making random endgame blunders that no human would make. Above that you have to play somewhat real chess to win.
