Forums

is chess won by tactics or strategy?

Sort:
LeWhales

Im scratching my head right now trying to figure out which makes me win more often

Interpolado

GG

Skye_1983

strategy

lamington13
You need both to win, but finding tactics improves your strategy I think
magipi

Tartakower said that chess is 99% tactics.

He meant that the player who sees more tactics will always win. If the players are equally very good at tactics (like in a GM vs GM game) then the player with the best strategy will win.

SeanTheSheep021

Both

AdhvaithAjay

Tactics are more important at your level. Even more important at your level is not blundering pieces though, focus on fixing that first (tactics will help)

AdhvaithAjay

Strategy doesn't matter if someone hangs a queen.

exceptionalfork

I disagree that chess is 99% tactics. That said, tactics definitely decide more games at lower levels than strategy does.

magipi
exceptionalfork wrote:

I disagree that chess is 99% tactics. That said, tactics definitely decide more games at lower levels than strategy does.

On the lower levels, 100% of games are decided by tactics.

Also, occasionally a game seems dry because all the tactics are missed by both players, so they just trade-trade-trade instead of grabbing the win.

x-poente16

i think both lol

LeWhales

Alright, guess I better eye on tactics

outwittedyou

Tactics are important, but they're also limited. And tactics are more of capitalizing on your opponent's mistakes and weaknesses.

Meanwhile, strategy is what propels the best to win. The difference between somebody rated 2900 and 2700 isn't tactics that are 200 rating better, it's 200 better strategy.

So work on your strategy, but do your puzzles everyday so you will see a tactic when available.

exceptionalfork
magipi wrote:
exceptionalfork wrote:

I disagree that chess is 99% tactics. That said, tactics definitely decide more games at lower levels than strategy does.

On the lower levels, 100% of games are decided by tactics.

Also, occasionally a game seems dry because all the tactics are missed by both players, so they just trade-trade-trade instead of grabbing the win.

At the lower levels, games are often decided by simply hanging a piece or something similar. Unless you are grouping in capturing of a hanging piece as a tactical maneuver, it is impossible that 100% of games are decided by tactics.

magipi
exceptionalfork wrote:

Unless you are grouping in capturing of a hanging piece as a tactical maneuver,

I do.

Silerra

I think strategy plays a bigger role at low level than is assumed here. You can stress your opponent by playing aggressively, which can irritate them and cause them to overlook tactical options. The other point is that you have to think about how best to learn tactics. Strategy also plays a role here. Well, the app offers numerous options for this, which is pretty practical. Conclusion: Chess is actually mostly decided by tactics, especially at a low level. Tactical skills are influenced by strategy. ๐Ÿ˜Š

magipi
Silerra wrote:

I think strategy plays a bigger role at low level than is assumed here.

This is the last lost game of the OP.

https://www.chess.com/game/live/121431266270?username=lewhales

Please comment on the key strategical points that influenced the game's outcome.

ChessMasteryOfficial

"Tactics flow from a superior position." โ€“ Bobby Fischer