Forums

checkmate with bishop and king

Sort:
yourlocalchessplayer22

If it ends up to one bishop and a king left, the game would end by insignificant material however if there were two bishops, there is a checkmate you can do.

KieferSmith
AngryPuffer
2718a
Arisktotle

Nxg6! is much stronger than Ng8!? as shown by Bobby Fischer in his heydays!

BanixU64

the only way to make a checkmate is with 2 bishop, it's imposible with one bishop

ChessIsFun314159
SeaWing7000 wrote:

I've just realised a lone queen cannot checkmate a lone king. All pieces need help to checkmate.

Yes, your king needs to help in that checkmate happy.png

Qinshu111_the_chess_panda
BanixU64 wrote:

the only way to make a checkmate is with 2 bishop, it's imposible with one bishop

Not two light squared bishop or two dark square bishop

ice_cream_cake
Arisktotle wrote:

Nxg6! is much stronger than Ng8!? as shown by Bobby Fischer in his heydays!

LOL

BanixU64
Qinshu111 escribió:
BanixU64 wrote:

the only way to make a checkmate is with 2 bishop, it's imposible with one bishop

Not two light squared bishop or two dark square bishop

oh right thanks, i forgot that

jetoba
Elite-Strategist wrote:
JamesPanayotakos wrote:

what about knight vs bishop checkmate

Also cannot. Bishop + Knight on same side can but never when they are the only piece left on the board with their king... here is how I practice Bishop + Knight End-Game Check-Mate...

K+B vs K+N can continue playing since checkmate is technically possible (by either side) even though it cannot be forced. If one of the two players flags then FIDE would almost automatically assess a loss (though not with While having Kf8/Ng6 while Black flags with Kh8/Bh7 since the only legal move Black has requires capturing the Knight and eliminate any chances for White to deliver checkmate) while USCF would only assess a loss if a checkmate could be forced.

CheckMatt33
It’s not easy, but can be done. It takes patience and precision
JamesPanayotakos
JamesPanayotakos
Andy-Lin wrote:

you can't checkmate with 1 bishop and 1 king

or 1 knight and 1 king

Furkan7271

Ä°mpossible man

SussyLarry
JamesPanayotakos wrote:
  •  

emotional damage

Yashikaa_Varshneyy

I think maybe

KneivsGambit
KieferSmith wrote:
 

That’s not a King and a Bishop vs a King.

magipi

Seven years have passed. We still don't know whether the OP wanted to write "bishop and knight" or not. And the thread is somehow still going on.

ciao_lane

I'm confused😓