Forums

Chess give this match a draw but it wasn't a drawπŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚

Sort:
UltimateSuriyeli

the match thats i played ended because of draw but the problem is it wasn't a draw. my opponent had a queen and 2 more pawns and i had 1 knight. he only had 1 second and i had 24 seconds. i needed to win that match with time. and when i tried to analyse it, there was more than 13+ moves to do. i want my win.  I even cannot analyse it, only self play works lmao πŸ˜‚.

UltimateSuriyeli

And it isnt a 50 move rule problem because as you can see white got a pawn at move 59, but game ended at 72nd move. Give my +8 man

FlamingFalconMan

Maybe you white ran out of time?

Fang_05

Knight and a king is not enough to checkmate a king without any help

tygxc

@4

There exists a series of legal moves that leads to checkmate:

'6.9 Except where one of Articles 5.1.1, 5.1.2, 5.2.1, 5.2.2, 5.2.3 applies, if a player does not complete the prescribed number of moves in the allotted time, the game is lost by that player. However, the game is drawn if the position is such that the opponent cannot checkmate the player’s king by any possible series of legal moves.'

Laws of Chess

So it is a faulty implementation on chess.com.

Khnemu_Nehep

You should be happy with the draw tbh lol

OskarJ2012
UltimateSuriyeli wrote:

the match thats i played ended because of draw but the problem is it wasn't a draw. my opponent had a queen and 2 more pawns and i had 1 knight. he only had 1 second and i had 24 seconds. i needed to win that match with time. and when i tried to analyse it, there was more than 13+ moves to do. i want my win. I even cannot analyse it, only self play works lmao πŸ˜‚.

you drew because of timeout vs insufficient material

TurnipSwizzle

Call 0 07759824122 UK