A couple of comments on the Analysis Board feature
Thanks! As for the 'philosophical' part, I wasn't actually questioning whether or not the analysis board feature should exist. Following hypothetical lines on a chess board has been in the tradition of correspondence chess since the days when people used snail-mail exclusively, and nobody considered it cheating. What I'm interested in (although not necessarily offended by) is the fact that this chess board is 'smart'; it can show me when a Knight fork I think I can pull off in a couple of moves is actually prevented by the fact that a Bishop is pinning my Knight to the King, etc.
Other sites I've played on have analysis boards that let you move the pieces freely (no move validation), which is probably why this struck me when I started playing here.
"However, obviously erik doesn't care, or he wouldn't have made the analysis board that way."
It's not obvious at all. It's possible that this feature of the analysis board never crossed Erik's mind.
I agree with DeepGreene, the analysis board must be free, so your missed calculations will make you loose the game.
I try to not use it, because in the REAL CHESS, you cant take the pieces and just 'try to see how it looks' LOL just figure out that!!
A request, plus a philosophical issue:
Request first: It strikes me as unfortunate that the data on the tabs to the right remain static (i.e. a description of the state of the actual game, not of the analysis board). It would be great, for instance, if the captured material display under 'Details' kept up with the hypothetical action on the board showing material taken during analysis. Same goes (to a lesser degree) for the Move list, although maybe the analysis moves could be displayed in 80% gray or something.
Philosophical issue: Other analysis features I've seen allow for free-form movement of the pieces, with no validation of whether a given move is legal or not. Does the fact that chess.com's analysis board won't let me stay in check or move my light-squared bishop to a dark square constitute help from an outside source--perhaps showing me something I might not otherwise see? I mean, fair is fair when everyone has the same tools at their disposal, but I find this a bit interesting.
Oh! And one last request since I'm already typing: How about a FEN notation on the Details tab? (This isn't specific to the analysis board.)