Of course you can. I’ll die before we can finish such a series. I’ve quit playing correspondence chess, however. Too much foul play.
Arrange the match with BYP. I’ll be happy to play him. He’s a nice guy, and I might enjoy giving him lessons. Maybe after the lessons, I can give him some tips that might redeem his videos, too.
His technical production skills are very good. That alone makes it understandable that his channel is popular, despite his horrid misunderstanding of the chess books he is reading and his tactical failures. He also communicates reasonably well and with enthusiasm.
His main problem is that he fails miserably at self-diagnosing the weaknesses in his play, and hence does not adequately target those weaknesses. Then, in the documenting of his journey, he fails to correctly locate himself on the map and thinks that he is far further along the path. With a better map and compass and a bit more objectivity, he might be able to start a series that could be instructive.
Of course, he’d be better off with a teacher but there are not many players in his region with the requisite skills. I think there is one player in the southern 2/3rds of Idaho rated over 2000 USCF. There was an IM a few years ago, but he moved to California. I don’t think online lessons are his style. I could be wrong, though. Maybe he’s just not willing to shell out the cash for such lessons.
It's been said before... in fact maybe you were the one who said it, but it seems he likes making videos more than he likes learning or playing chess. Since a beginner level chess player (unlike, say, a beginner level musician) isn't immediately recognizable by the masses, it's just something he happened to fall into.
And especially in his earlier videos you get a strong vibe of the religion-esque truth via authority. "During my studies of Silman . . . and if you study Silman you'd know" etc. It's not the information that's key, it's the patriarch.
Hah