Forums

why is queens pawn worst than kings pawn

Sort:
a-normal-chessplayer

like why

number1chessplayernocap

😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😫😫😫😫😫😫 worst is WILD

a-normal-chessplayer

please be relevent and kind for other 🐡

Strayaningen

It's not.

a-normal-chessplayer

kings pawn is better

a-normal-chessplayer

cause

RandomChessPlayer62

King's pawn is better because black can't do the KID and it opens up diagonals for queen and bishop.

magipi

Someone needs to learn the difference between "worse" and "worst". Especially if you're flying the US flag.

tygxc

Both 1 e4 and 1 d4 are good, the difference, if any, is small.

a-normal-chessplayer

magipi its not that deep

a-normal-chessplayer

😐

AstroPro6512

King's pawn openings typically are more open and active whereas Queen's pawn positions tend to be more positional.

a-normal-chessplayer

πŸ‘

a-normal-chessplayer

nice

a-normal-chessplayer

queens pawn has like pros and cons

reevjar2
AstroPro6512 wrote:

King's pawn openings typically are more open and active whereas Queen's pawn positions tend to be more positional.

But the Accelerated London kinda not THAT postitional in below 1300 elo chess.

It's based on the player.

I play Queen's Gambit or Accelerated London

reevjar2

as white

reevjar2
a-normal-chessplayer wrote:

queens pawn has like pros and cons

There are no pros and cons. Like i said its based on the player, same as the king's pawn

a-normal-chessplayer

they are like the same tbh

reevjar2
tygxc wrote:

Both 1 e4 and 1 d4 are good, the difference, if any, is small.

I agree