😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😫😫😫😫😫😫 worst is WILD
why is queens pawn worst than kings pawn
Sort:
![RandomChessPlayer62](https://images.chesscomfiles.com/uploads/v1/user/303570947.24f9df63.50x50o.a7e454caefc4.png)
King's pawn is better because black can't do the KID and it opens up diagonals for queen and bishop.
![magipi](https://images.chesscomfiles.com/uploads/v1/user/33406185.d3f19aa2.50x50o.d42fc468e097.jpeg)
Someone needs to learn the difference between "worse" and "worst". Especially if you're flying the US flag.
![AstroPro6512](https://images.chesscomfiles.com/uploads/v1/user/370128415.a65f9e3c.50x50o.acdcbc911d77.png)
King's pawn openings typically are more open and active whereas Queen's pawn positions tend to be more positional.
![reevjar2](https://images.chesscomfiles.com/uploads/v1/user/192440501.3d464d25.50x50o.ccab40b86acf.png)
AstroPro6512 wrote:
King's pawn openings typically are more open and active whereas Queen's pawn positions tend to be more positional.
But the Accelerated London kinda not THAT postitional in below 1300 elo chess.
It's based on the player.
I play Queen's Gambit or Accelerated London
like why