Nuuuuuuuu, who is this guy, how he beated me????
https://www.chess.com/analysis/game/live/89087515233?tab=analysis
:*(
Which is better: e4 or d4?
Sort:
JsonEP wrote:
Its alr you did fine
I forgot to kill the other knight, I hate knights, they are just bishop food.
But it doesn't seem I have enough turns to kill it hmmmmm
I need to do A6 before that other knight can do what you did.
Sep 22, 2023
0
#45
1983B-Boy wrote:
[quote]
Stonewall atack is bad.
Rosseau is worse[/quote]
and yet in the REAL WORLD, 3...f5 has THE BEST stats rated 1600-2000!
in fact, it is the ONLY reply that can legit claim to be WINNING
another gambit hater crashes into reality
it's not even about the stats for me. I hate the scandinavian or any other opening that allows the e5 cramp. gotta play 1...e5 to stop that. i'm NOT looking for draws, so screw the petroff. I don't want to get into long positional struggles either. rousseau is the most tactical answer for me. as a king's gambit player too, I'm already familiar with semi-open f files and knight plus Qh4+ dangers.
play the sicilian either narjorf or
Sveshnikov Sicilian
those are the only too non elosing sicilians play those if you want tactis
The opening is extremely important at beginner/post beginner/amateur level: When you lose a game, you can blame it on the bad opening, and not your very poor play, and so keep your ego intact.
Sep 22, 2023
0
#47
Mazetoskylo wrote:
The opening is extremely important at beginner/post beginner/amateur level: When you lose a game, you can blame it on the bad opening, and not your very poor play, and so keep your ego
Sep 22, 2023
0
#49
sassygirltebritish wrote:
play the sicilian either narjorf or
Sveshnikov Sicilianthose are the only too non elosing sicilians play those if you want tactis
This might be more credible if you knew how to spell Najdorf. But that aside, such grand, sweeping statements about what is and isn't playable are all baloney at this level of play.
Sep 22, 2023
0
#50
DrSpudnik wrote:
sassygirltebritish wrote:
play the sicilian either narjorf or
Sveshnikov Sicilianthose are the only too non elosing sicilians play those if you want tactis
This might be more credible if you knew how to spell Najdorf. But that aside, such grand, sweeping statements about what is and isn't playable are all baloney at this level of play.
No it isn't I'm talking about otb chess not chess.com if you want to play if you have to play 30 minute time controls or more and I've played a lot of Sicilians otb and the nardorf or the shenekov are the best options to get a good game and don't make fun of my spelling I'm too lazy to correct it
Sep 22, 2023
0
#51
sassygirltebritish wrote:
DrSpudnik wrote:
sassygirltebritish wrote:
play the sicilian either narjorf or
Sveshnikov Sicilianthose are the only too non elosing sicilians play those if you want tactis
This might be more credible if you knew how to spell Najdorf. But that aside, such grand, sweeping statements about what is and isn't playable are all baloney at this level of play.
No it isn't I'm talking about otb chess not chess.com if you want to play if you have to play 30 minute time controls or more and I've played a lot of Sicilians otb and the nardorf or the shenekov are the best options to get a good game and don't make fun of my spelling I'm too lazy to correct it
I won't mention it.
Sep 22, 2023
0
#52
DrSpudnik wrote:
sassygirltebritish wrote:
DrSpudnik wrote:
sassygirltebritish wrote:
play the sicilian either narjorf or
Sveshnikov Sicilianthose are the only too non elosing sicilians play those if you want tactis
This might be more credible if you knew how to spell Najdorf. But that aside, such grand, sweeping statements about what is and isn't playable are all baloney at this level of play.
No it isn't I'm talking about otb chess not chess.com if you want to play if you have to play 30 minute time controls or more and I've played a lot of Sicilians otb and the nardorf or the shenekov are the best options to get a good game and don't make fun of my spelling I'm too lazy to correct it
I won't mention it.
Thank you
Oct 10, 2023
0
#55
Balviboy wrote:
Can I just say the Petrovs defence is actually fun to play
You can say that. I kind of doubt it, but you can say it.
Oct 10, 2023
0
#57
DrSpudnik wrote:
Balviboy wrote:
Can I just say the Petrovs defence is actually fun to play
You can say that. I kind of doubt it, but you can say it.
Ok French defense
Oct 11, 2023
0
#58
sassygirltebritish wrote:
DrSpudnik wrote:
Balviboy wrote:
Can I just say the Petrovs defence is actually fun to play
You can say that. I kind of doubt it, but you can say it.
Ok French defense
The French irritates both White and Black. I play it from both sides of the board and would never think to say it's "fun" to play.
Oct 11, 2023
0
#59
DrSpudnik wrote:
sassygirltebritish wrote:
DrSpudnik wrote:
Balviboy wrote:
Can I just say the Petrovs defence is actually fun to play
You can say that. I kind of doubt it, but you can say it.
Ok French defense
The French irritates both White and Black. I play it from both sides of the board and would never think to say it's "fun" to play.
Any openings that gets you a good position is playable
BlackKang I actually just won a game against you so, yeah... And I have lower Elo