Forums

New Chess Opening “Tic Tac Toe Gambit”

Sort:
GM_lolimsocoollol38383

Pretty solid opening in my opinion. Analysis doesn’t say the position is totally losing.

Compadre_J

Bad Opening!

You just lost 1 pawn!

You have no development lead!

You are losing with no compensation!

ibrust
lolimsocoollol38383 wrote:

Analysis doesn’t say the position is totally losing.

It's not exactly a very high bar you're setting.

The opening doesn't make sense, fiancetto typically leads to a slow positional game, sacrificing a central pawn for initiative doesn't help you in a slow positional game. Black also hasn't made any moves that create vulnerabilities. So you are just really throwing away a pawn for no clear purpose.

Aserew12phone

Just smth bad between indian and danish

Aserew12phone

HOW DID YOU MANAGE TO CREATE A TERRIBLE OPENING OUT OF 2 GREAT ONES-DANISH AND INDIAN

GM_lolimsocoollol38383
ibrust wrote:
lolimsocoollol38383 wrote:

Analysis doesn’t say the position is totally losing.

It's not exactly a very high bar you're setting.

The opening doesn't make sense, fiancetto typically leads to a slow positional game, sacrificing a central pawn for initiative doesn't help you in a slow positional game. Black also hasn't made any moves that create vulnerabilities. So you are just really throwing away a pawn for no clear purpose.

Yes but now the queen is open diagonally

ibrust

Can you show any attacking line where black plays in a reasonable manner and your pawn sac pays for itself? All you've shown are developing moves leading to nothing but you being down a pawn. Which makes sense because you fiancettod, so you were leading into a slow positional game until you threw the central pawn away.

aserew12

Bro if you wanna play danish gambit play it

Mazetoskylo

Gambitting a pawn in the opening makes sense in any of these cases:

- gaining an advantage in development,

- getting a dominance in the center.

- exposing the opponent's king.

Which of the above applies for your gambit?