Forums

Kings Gambit Yes or No

Sort:
1_Qxe8
I know that lots of people will object to this however once I learnt all of the theory of it I found it to be a powerful weapon as white. Another upside is that it usually catches your opponent off guard and brings them to a position where you’re more comfortable.
Toldsted

Yes. Fine and fun opening!

Santoy

I like King's gambit accepted but used to do poorly against the Falkbeer which was very trendy at the time so I stopped playing it. Also often struggled against the Kieseritzky (? g5, g4).

Against opponents that are not well clued up on either of these, I used to love it. Boris Spassky was an influence because he played it at the very top level. I may give it a try again.

1_Qxe8
I recommend doing the course on the kings gambit by Simon Williams.
tygxc

@1
'I would like to play the King's Gambit, but I could not find a way for white to equalise' - Kramnik

landloch

I played the King's Gambit for a while and had some very fun games with it, but ultimately it felt like I was coming out of the opening worse off more often than not.

Jasonosaurus

Yes, very much. It's my favorite opening to play as White. Super fun! And 1_Qxe8, you are correct, King's Gambit is kind of rarely played, so your opponent as Black will generally be much less familiar with the positions than you. This is a big advantage. With a little study, this opening is very good for White. Certainly for us amateurs, anyway.

In my experience, Black declines the gambit about 50% of the time. This feels like an admission that taking the pawn would be good for White.

ViolaFerrari

Ultimate opening Kings gambit.

AerisChua
Moving the f pawn isn’t a good idea. It opens up the h4-e1 diagonal, allowing black to win tempo after 2…Qh4. It’s not good, compared to the queen’s gambit. Although it is quite a bad opening, there ARE some lines that prevent this, I think