The final round set up a clash for first place.
Kazim had 3/4, and I was at 3.5/4.
We both delved into IQP theory.
Unfortunately, as the game reached its crucial moments, he overlooked a Knight Fork.
Here is the most famous example of playing against the IQP.
If nothing else, I hope readers come away with this key takeaway: the way masters draw on knowledge from classic games to inform their own play. This highlights the importance of studying chess history.
For the sake of both players, I will just leave this game for the masses to analyze. It was quite early on in the battle when both players were down to less than 1-minute on the clock. The most obvious explanation for their play.
...and in the final game. NM Dave Vest gets a massive space advantage from the get-go and NM Altucher demonstrates tenacity in defending.
A fun event on the board and an even more entertaining event off the board. A lot of great chess lessons and a lot of new friendships were forged.
FINAL STANDINGS:
1ST - Andrews - 4.5/5
2nd - Gulamali - 3/5
3rd - Altucher - 2.5/5
4th/5th - Vest and Peatman 1.5/4
6th - Yanayt 1/5
Until next time...